Список литературы к подкасту, который можно прослушать здесь:)

https://soundcloud.com/user-885341914/protsess-sblizheniya-lyudey-vo-vremya-obshcheniya

https://anchor.fm/--457/episodes/ep-e436eu/podcast-afm6v2

Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391–418.

Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–B25.

Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2007). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465–1477.

Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 1482–1493.

Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: APA Reprinted in R. M. Baecker (Ed.), Groupware and computer- supported cooperative work: Assisting human–human collaboration (pp. 222–233). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.

Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation (from the William James lectures, Harvard University, 1967). In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 1–20.

Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 167–226.

Schoot, L., Heyselaar, E., Hagoort, P., & Segaert, K. (2016). Does Syntactic Alignment Effectively Influence How Speakers Are Perceived by Their Conversation Partner?, 1–22.